From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Aug 21 18:10:53 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 22 Aug 2002 01:10:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 19526 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2002 01:10:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Aug 2002 01:10:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Aug 2002 01:10:52 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17hgUu-0006aE-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 18:10:52 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17hgUF-0006Zv-00; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 18:10:11 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 21 Aug 2002 18:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17hgU9-0006Zl-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 18:10:05 -0700
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 18:10:05 -0700
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] The number of dogs.
Message-ID: <20020822011005.GA25193@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <F52tSgcOrBLSAQV6uPD000001d9@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <F52tSgcOrBLSAQV6uPD000001d9@hotmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 740
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:56:11PM +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote:
> I can't say for sure what {li mo'e le gerku} means, but one theory
> holds that it is the dimensioned number "all the dogs", 

"All the things I am currently describing as dogs", actually. Note the
'le'.

> like {li mo'e ci gerku} would give the dimensioned number "3 dogs".
> "All the dogs" might work for "the number of dogs", but where would
> you use it? Not in a context that asks for a bare number.

And why not, exactly?

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest.
le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno
je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/




