From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Aug 21 19:18:41 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 22 Aug 2002 02:18:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 15703 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2002 02:18:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Aug 2002 02:18:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Aug 2002 02:18:41 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17hhYX-0006ku-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 19:18:41 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17hhYN-0006kc-00; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 19:18:31 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 21 Aug 2002 19:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17hhYI-0006kT-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 19:18:26 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g7M2MlIC002015
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 21:22:48 -0500 (CDT)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g7M2Mlnt002014
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 21:22:47 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 21:22:47 -0500
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] The number of dogs.
Message-ID: <20020822022247.GA1958@allusion.net>
References: <F52tSgcOrBLSAQV6uPD000001d9@hotmail.com> <0208212116190K.01574@neofelis> <20020822014133.GA1648@allusion.net> <0208212205410L.01574@neofelis>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0208212205410L.01574@neofelis>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 746
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 10:05:41PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 August 2002 21:41, Jordan DeLong wrote:
> > However, you're clearly wrong evidenced by chap18 ex. 18.4:
> > mi viska vei mo'e lo'e lanzu ve'o cinfo
> > I see (the typical family)-number of lions
> > I see a pride of lions.
> >
> > Given that, and the other discussion on mo'e, the meaning of li mo'e le
> > gerku is what you'd expect. (li mo'e ro le su'o gerku -- the count of =
all
> > the dogs i'm currently describing (i.e., what rlp said)).
>=20
> mo'e pa lanzu is the number of members in one family. mo'e pa gerku is th=
us=20
> the number of members in one dog, but what does that mean? But the number=
of=20
> members in one mole is Avogadro's number.

.oi mi cortu le stedu

"mo'e pa lanzu" is more likely "one family"... :)

--=20
Jordan DeLong
fracture@allusion.net


--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE9ZEr3DrrilS51AZ8RAqe9AJoDFD3DJucRHhjKCktSHAVj+bbxpQCgz5EE
Ke62r876YiOdV5AjhOprkfY=
=bjA0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF--

