From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Sat Aug 31 16:47:57 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 31 Aug 2002 23:47:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 9239 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2002 23:47:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 31 Aug 2002 23:47:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Aug 2002 23:47:55 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17lHxx-0000hx-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 16:47:45 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17lHxM-0000gK-00; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 16:47:08 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 31 Aug 2002 16:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailbox-1.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.101])
  by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17lHxH-0000gB-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 16:47:03 -0700
Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-69-56.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.69.56])
  by mailbox-1.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 87B5F1F07A
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 01:46:29 +0200 (DST)
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
Subject: RE: [lojban] dictionary - which words?
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 00:48:01 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMGEIMGHAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
In-Reply-To: <0208311820150D.03340@neofelis>
Importance: Normal
X-archive-position: 882
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
Reply-To: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=122260811
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin

> What about {ctelr zei kemxasybakni}? No one would use {kemxasybakni} except 
> in a zei-lujvo, but one would use {xasybakni} by itself. Should there be an 
> entry for {ctelr zei kemxasybakni}, or one for {kemxasybakni}?

zei creates new lexemes, so "X zei Y" should have its own entry.
This is because the meaning of the whole is not wholly derivable
from the meaning of the parts.

--And.