From jcowan@reutershealth.com Sat Aug 31 16:50:06 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 31 Aug 2002 23:50:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 58663 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2002 23:50:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 31 Aug 2002 23:50:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Aug 2002 23:50:06 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17lI0E-0000l3-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 16:50:06 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17lI0C-0000kl-00; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 16:50:04 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 31 Aug 2002 16:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [65.246.141.151] (helo=mail2.reutershealth.com)
  by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17lI07-0000kW-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 16:49:59 -0700
Received: from skunk.reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[10.65.117.21])
  by mail2.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA17922;
  Sat, 31 Aug 2002 19:59:33 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200208312359.TAA17922@mail2.reutershealth.com>
Received: by skunk.reutershealth.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 31 Aug 2002 19:45:07 -0400
Subject: Re: [lojban] JL & LK
To: bob@RATTLESNAKE.COM
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 19:45:07 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: jkominek@miranda.org, lojban-list@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: <m17kpm9-000IeSC@localhost> from "Robert J. Chassell" at Aug 30, 2002 01:41:41 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-archive-position: 883
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Reply-To: jcowan@reutershealth.com
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=8122456
X-Yahoo-Profile: john_w_cowan

Robert J. Chassell scripsit:

> As far as I can figure out, PDF is designed by and for people who
> typeset and print. PDF was designed for a world that is passing; it
> is not designed for the modern world.

The consumption of paper is rising steadily, and the need for final-form
(non-editable) documents has not gone away. I myself now print at
600 dpi a good deal that once I would have read on-screen at 72 dpi.

I grow old, I grow old,
I shall wear the corners of my glasses rolled.
--Not T.S. Eliot

> How well does PDF work with an acoustic desktop? 

It depends on how the PDF was created: it always contains glyphs; it
may or may not contain characters.

> (An example of an online issue: from the point of view of someone
> from the early 1980s, HTML is instrinsically broken. Because of its
> design, you can never create an HTML document that you can navigate as
> efficiently as an Info document. This is because HTML does not
> distinguish between references to another part of the same document
> and references to node outside the document. So your search mechanism
> can work well only within the current page; or you must depend on a
> preconstructed index.)

By convention it is easy to distinguish, because hrefs whose value
begin with "#" are always intradocument. It is possible to create
hrefs that are intradocument and do not begin with "#", but only by
punning, which is bad HTML practice.

> XML is not as good as Texinfo; the sources are harder to read or
> listen to than Texinfo sources, but it is a popular mark up language
> and would be an OK choice, too.

XML is not a markup language. DocBook and TEI are markup languages.

-- 
John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com www.reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan
Assent may be registered by a signature, a handshake, or a click of a computer
mouse transmitted across the invisible ether of the Internet. Formality
is not a requisite; any sign, symbol or action, or even willful inaction,
as long as it is unequivocally referable to the promise, may create a contract.
--_Specht v. Netscape_




