From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Sep 05 15:10:58 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 5 Sep 2002 22:10:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 4870 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2002 22:10:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Sep 2002 22:10:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Sep 2002 22:10:58 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17n4q2-0003hF-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 05 Sep 2002 15:10:58 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17n4pq-0003gs-00; Thu, 05 Sep 2002 15:10:46 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 05 Sep 2002 15:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17n4pk-0003gj-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2002 15:10:40 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g85MFUwD056830
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 17:15:30 -0500 (CDT)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g85MFOgk056825
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 17:15:24 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 17:15:24 -0500
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] termsets
Message-ID: <20020905221524.GA56669@allusion.net>
References: <F159wThDuoXBfdmywhV00012d31@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <F159wThDuoXBfdmywhV00012d31@hotmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 932
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 08:29:00PM +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote:
> la djan cusku di'e
> >Invent Yourself scripsit:
> > > Termsets, rarely used, few understand them. In marking simultaneous
> > > claims, how are they different from ".e"?
> >
> >{A, B} love {C, D} means that A loves C and B loves D.
>=20
> That corresponds to Lojban jo'u:
>=20
> abu jo'u by prami cy jo'u dy

Isn't fa'u more like that?
.imu'a .abu. fa'u by. prami cy. fa'u dy.

--=20
Jordan DeLong
fracture@allusion.net


--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE9d9d8DrrilS51AZ8RAtOVAKDCa6wlabOKT6IPJXUIWvFckg8nEwCgo0hQ
oAYD2ms4v1vI+5MqHawvQZI=
=0r+e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G--

