From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Sep 05 16:54:23 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 5 Sep 2002 23:54:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 9454 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2002 23:54:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Sep 2002 23:54:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Sep 2002 23:54:22 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17n6S7-0003wG-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 05 Sep 2002 16:54:23 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17n6RU-0003vy-00; Thu, 05 Sep 2002 16:53:44 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 05 Sep 2002 16:53:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17n6RO-0003vp-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2002 16:53:38 -0700 Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 16:53:37 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: Re: General comment: 'here'. Message-ID: <20020905235337.GP14107@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20020905233937.GL14107@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020905233937.GL14107@chain.digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 938 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:39:37PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > At logfest, we were discussing how to say 'here'. As in, "I'll be > staying here all night", or whatever. > > Things I came up with afterwards: > > le vi se zvati > le vi stizu > le vi ku That last is apparently illegal. Perhaps "le vi co'e", but that seems unnecessary. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/