From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri Sep 06 13:41:25 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 6 Sep 2002 20:41:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 9893 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2002 20:41:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 6 Sep 2002 20:41:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Sep 2002 20:41:25 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17nPuv-0006Ol-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 13:41:25 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17nPuP-0006OL-00; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 13:40:53 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 06 Sep 2002 13:40:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17nPuI-0006OC-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2002 13:40:46 -0700 Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 13:40:46 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: Re: [lojban] General comment: 'here'. Message-ID: <20020906204046.GD23094@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20020905233937.GL14107@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20020906025706.GA4591@barsoom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020906025706.GA4591@barsoom.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 958 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 09:57:06PM -0500, the Edward Blevins wrote: > I would argue that just because an english sentence uses "here" the > lojban transaltion doesn't always need to treat it as a sumti. Absolutely. Unfortunately, I can't remember the original example. 8) -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/