Subject: Re: [lojban] another "simple" translation

From: Pierre Abbat <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 18:16:43 -0400

On Friday 06 September 2002 16:38, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
li'o
> > "le" is allowed; "la", "lai", "la'i", and "doi" are not. The name is
> > Léon Werth, btw.
>
> In that case, jbofihe has a bug:
>
> rlpowell@please> jbofihe -x
> leon.
> Unrecognizable word 'leon' at line 1 column 1
> rlpowell@please> jbofihe -x
> luon.
> luon. /[NAME]/

Looks like you are using a different version than I am. Try "laos" and 
"la,os". The version I have (0.38) calls "laos" a cmene and "la,os" a 
breakup, which are both wrong because "ao" is not a Lojban diphthong, and 
",os" isn't a possible Lojban word.

phma