From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Sep 08 09:36:15 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 8 Sep 2002 16:36:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 12745 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2002 16:36:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Sep 2002 16:36:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Sep 2002 16:36:15 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17o52l-0003rH-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 08 Sep 2002 09:36:15 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17o52b-0003qz-00; Sun, 08 Sep 2002 09:36:05 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 08 Sep 2002 09:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17o52V-0003qq-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2002 09:35:59 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g88Gf5wD083203
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 11:41:06 -0500 (CDT)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g88Gf5QD083202
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 11:41:05 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 11:41:05 -0500
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] Le petit prince - I
Message-ID: <20020908164105.GA83104@allusion.net>
References: <F83s6hdn1KVHYS8YV2b00001288@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <F83s6hdn1KVHYS8YV2b00001288@hotmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 979
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 04:28:30PM +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote:
[...]
> > > >I hope a better word for digestion can be found.
> > >
> > > I don't particularly like {befru'e}, but is it so bad?
> >
> >Insofar as it can probably not even be groked
>=20
> Anybody has a better suggestion?

The lujvo liste suggests:
ctiru'e
ctiru'egau
djaruntygau

I kinda favor the last one.

Also it's good to use lujvo people can actually look up instead of
creating new ones which mean the same things (though this will be
less of a problem with jbovlaste).

--=20
Jordan DeLong
fracture@allusion.net


--a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE9e32hDrrilS51AZ8RAgklAJ9eIGZ1rlF5HLTLjaxI3ajsmbz79ACfee35
IVXfjO8F0QDRcwatKAq74Vw=
=qW5A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C--

