From Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de Mon Sep 09 07:25:01 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 9 Sep 2002 14:25:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 87702 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2002 14:25:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Sep 2002 14:25:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 2002 14:24:59 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17oPTH-00060T-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 07:24:59 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17oPSe-00060B-00; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 07:24:20 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 09 Sep 2002 07:24:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spree.gedas.de ([139.1.44.12]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17oPSX-000600-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 07:24:14 -0700 Received: from spree.gedas.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spree.gedas.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA23002 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 16:23:42 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from blnsem05.de.gedas.vwg (blnsem05.gedas.de [139.1.84.49]) by spree.gedas.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA22998 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 16:23:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by blnsem05.de.gedas.vwg with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 16:23:41 +0200 Message-ID: To: "'lojban-list@lojban.org'" Subject: Re: Translation comments requested Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 16:23:32 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-archive-position: 993 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: "Newton, Philip" Reply-To: Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=23036112 X-Yahoo-Profile: elder_newton mi cusku di'e > I, Nephi, said [...] > mi noi se cmene zo nefis. cusku Is there a better way to express this? Can I use "mi goi la nefis."? Or does {goi} only work with KOhA? Or some other cmavo along the lines of "equivalently" or "also known as"? mu'omi'e filip. -- filip.niutyn. All opinions are my own, not my employer's. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.