From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Sep 09 16:59:34 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 9 Sep 2002 23:59:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 73472 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2002 23:59:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Sep 2002 23:59:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 2002 23:59:33 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17oYRJ-0007RA-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 16:59:33 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17oYQg-0007Qs-00; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 16:58:55 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 09 Sep 2002 16:58:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17oYQT-0007Qj-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 16:58:41 -0700 Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 16:58:40 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: Re: Archive location. Message-ID: <20020909235839.GE27783@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20020909172434.GB16233@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20020909232909.GA92634@allusion.net> <20020909232933.GD27783@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20020910000003.GA93590@allusion.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020910000003.GA93590@allusion.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 1006 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 07:00:03PM -0500, Jordan DeLong wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 04:29:33PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:29:09PM -0500, Jordan DeLong wrote: > [...] > > > .e'u le jondatnymu'e > > > > Umm. There's no nice way to say this. > > > > Of all the ways that I've seen people try to come up with lojban words > > for the web, that is the one I like the least. > > ka'u la nitcon. finti le valsi .i mu'i ma do traji leka na nelci ri Because, dammit, there are no universes involved. Although looking at the definition, I see it incorporates great little pieces of malglico: e.g. 'universe of discourse', or 'world of birds'; OK, maybe it's not so bad. > .i pe'i ri xamgu je banzu .ije lo cmene .a lo fu'ivla ji'a da'i > banzu I like skamruebe > I'd just prefer that "balcukta" doesn't become the generally-used > lujvo for "web" (because it sucks much). (I guess tend to prefer more > literal lujvo when possible...). Ah. You're right, I had forgotten (blanked out?) balcukta. Yes, jondatnymu'e is better than balcukta. A *lot* better. My apologies. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/