From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Sep 10 11:21:36 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 10 Sep 2002 18:21:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 65481 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2002 18:21:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Sep 2002 18:21:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Sep 2002 18:21:35 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17opdo-0006cP-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:21:36 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17opdG-0006c2-00; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:21:02 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:20:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17opd9-0006bt-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:20:55 -0700 Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:20:55 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: Re: word for "www" (was: Archive location.) Message-ID: <20020910182055.GE6798@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20020910175215.GD6798@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20020910140316.F68275-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020910140316.F68275-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 1025 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 02:15:35PM -0400, Invent Yourself wrote: > On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > I think that picking lujvo that are *guaranteed* to become obsolete > > and are, in fact, already ambigous is pointless at best and moronic > > at worst. > > I see you are turning this into a personal flame war. I certainly wasn't intending to. If I had intended a personal flame war, I would have insulted you directly. > Since I don't think people will continue to read past what seems to be > becoming a personal argument, I'll reserve my responses for other > posts less likely to annoy the readers, and preferably, for those who > have read and comprehended the entirety and subtlety of the original > arguments. That's too bad, because I thought I made some pretty damn good points. And I don't think that 'the entirety and subtlety' (and modesty? zo'o) of the original arguments are as far beyond my intellect as you seem to. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/