From pycyn@aol.com Tue Sep 10 11:42:44 2002
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 10 Sep 2002 18:42:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 18908 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2002 18:42:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Sep 2002 18:42:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r05.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.101)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Sep 2002 18:42:43 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com
  by imo-r05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.10.) id r.1a9.8336f0f (3956)
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 14:42:38 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <1a9.8336f0f.2aaf971d@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 14:42:37 EDT
Subject: Re: [lojban] tunlo
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_1a9.8336f0f.2aaf971d_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10509
From: pycyn@aol.com
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001
X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra

--part1_1a9.8336f0f.2aaf971d_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 9/10/2002 11:31:21 AM Central Daylight Time, 
gordon.dyke@bluewin.ch writes:


> mu'i ma noda ka'e sumti zo tunlo li re i pe'i le ba nenri be le betfu cu
> go'i .ei i pe'ipei
> 

This was one of a set of "basic actions," in the philosophical "muscle 
twitch" sense, that were separated out to allow one predicate to cover a wide 
range of "non-basic actions" (twitches with purposes and affecting things 
other than the body itself) by compounding. Whether the philosophy behind 
this was sound, we are stuck with several of these and they seem to work OK. 
On the other hand, we left several potential members of the set unreduced and 
somehow manage to deal with all the cases anyhow. (see the "action" set in 
the 1-place predicates in the partially organized lists).
We can, after all, swallow without swallowing anything, even spit -- and 
{zi'o} is more suspect than compounds.

--part1_1a9.8336f0f.2aaf971d_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2>In a message dated 9/10/2002 11:31:21 AM Central Daylight Time, gordon.dyke@bluewin.ch writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">mu'i ma noda ka'e sumti zo tunlo li re i pe'i le ba nenri be le betfu cu<BR>
go'i .ei i pe'ipei<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
This was one of a set of "basic actions," in the philosophical "muscle twitch" sense, that were separated out to allow one predicate to cover a wide range of "non-basic actions" (twitches with purposes and affecting things other than the body itself) by compounding.&nbsp; Whether the philosophy behind this was sound, we are stuck with several of these and they seem to work OK.&nbsp; On the other hand, we left several potential members of the set unreduced and somehow manage to deal with all the cases anyhow.&nbsp; (see the "action" set in the 1-place predicates in the partially organized lists).<BR>
We can, after all, swallow without swallowing anything, even spit -- and {zi'o} is more suspect than compounds.</FONT></HTML>

--part1_1a9.8336f0f.2aaf971d_boundary--

