From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Sep 10 15:07:09 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 10 Sep 2002 22:07:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 29965 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2002 22:07:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Sep 2002 22:07:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Sep 2002 22:07:09 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17otA6-0007UG-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:07:10 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17ot9Y-0007Tu-00; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:06:36 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:06:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17ot9R-0007Tl-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:06:29 -0700 Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:06:29 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Le Petit Prince: Can we legally translate it? Message-ID: <20020910220629.GY6798@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20020910215248.GV6798@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 1059 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 05:59:17PM -0400, Craig wrote: > >Suggest something out of copyright, with reasonably modern language, > >originally written in English, that someone besides you here has > >actually read. > > Edgar Allen Poe. You know, you're the first person, IIRC, to actually answer that. 8) That seems like a good choice, actually, and leads me to wonder if Thoreau is still in copyright. I, personally, have little interest in Poe, but if someone wants to step up to the plate and pick a single work, I'd put it on CVS. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/