From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Sep 10 15:07:55 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 10 Sep 2002 22:07:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 31070 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2002 22:07:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Sep 2002 22:07:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Sep 2002 22:07:55 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17otAp-0007Vc-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:07:55 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17otAH-0007Ue-00; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:07:21 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:07:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17otAA-0007UR-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:07:14 -0700 Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:07:14 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: word for "www" (was: Archive location.) Message-ID: <20020910220714.GZ6798@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20020910182959.GF6798@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 1060 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:00:03PM +0100, And Rosta wrote: > Robin CA: > > The whole *point* of lujvo, unless I'm missing something, is that > > someone should be able to dissect them and figure out what you mean. > > Not so. Lujvo are simply a means of creating new words for new > meanings. However, other things being equal (e.g. word length), > a candidate lujvo is held to be the more superior the more its > meaning and place structure can be guessed from its constituent > parts. I can't tell if you're agreeing with me or not. 8) -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/