From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Sep 11 11:11:30 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 11 Sep 2002 18:11:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 54227 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2002 18:11:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Sep 2002 18:11:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Sep 2002 18:11:29 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17pBxZ-0002g1-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:11:29 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17pBx3-0002fT-00; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:10:57 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:10:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17pBww-0002fJ-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:10:50 -0700 Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:10:50 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: Re: [lojban] word for "www" (was: Archive location.) Message-ID: <20020911181050.GN6798@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20020911105811.U73477-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> <200209111659.MAA22279@mail2.reutershealth.com> <20020911113528.A6835@miranda.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020911113528.A6835@miranda.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 1121 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 11:35:28AM -0600, Jay F Kominek wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:48:33PM -0400, John Cowan wrote: > > Invent Yourself scripsit: > > > > > Everyone, I've been using the word "cukta" to mean roughly: a > > > collection of documents and/or pages. I don't believe that I have > > > yet heard an argument that contradicts this by adding more > > > restrictions to the definition which are derived from the place > > > structures, and not simply induced from the stereotypical "book". > > > > The place structures are not enough. > > > > Otherwise, there would be no distinguishing between any animals or > > plants (modulo the few surviving exceptions) since they all have x1 > > as the creature and x2 as its species/type. > > x1 of bakni, sure, is a creature, but more specifically it has to be a > bovine creature. > > x2 of bakni, sure, is a species, but more specifically, it has to be a > species of bovine. > > Same for the rest of them. That was *precisely* his point. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/