From xod@thestonecutters.net Wed Sep 11 13:09:53 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 11 Sep 2002 20:09:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 9819 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2002 20:09:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Sep 2002 20:09:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Sep 2002 20:09:53 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17pDo9-00050U-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:09:53 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17pDnV-0003eb-00; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:09:14 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:09:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17pDnO-0003Ye-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:09:06 -0700 Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8BK94Y75825 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:09:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:09:04 -0400 (EDT) To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: Re: word for "www" (was: Archive location.) In-Reply-To: <20020911180952.GM6798@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Message-ID: <20020911160246.K73991-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 1138 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Invent Yourself Reply-To: xod@thestonecutters.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=110189215 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > On a parallel note, it's interesting that the people who were around > > when the notion of lujvo was being developed have a quite different > > understanding of the intent behind lujvo than those who came much > > later in the game. Poor communication? > > Has anyone besides PC who was around then spoken up on this point? Rosta (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/message/15531) and Lojbab's recent post (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/message/15584) where it turns out that a good half of the old lujvo are not literal at all. -- Before Sept. 11 there was not the present excited talk about a strike on Iraq. There is no evidence of any connection between Iraq and that act of terrorism. Why would that event change the situation? -- Howard Zinn