From pycyn@aol.com Wed Sep 11 14:26:05 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 11 Sep 2002 21:26:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 99423 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2002 21:26:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Sep 2002 21:26:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d06.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.38) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Sep 2002 21:26:05 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.10.) id r.17a.e5c1bc2 (4584) for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 17:25:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <17a.e5c1bc2.2ab10ee6@aol.com> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 17:25:58 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: word for "www" (was: Archive location.) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_17a.e5c1bc2.2ab10ee6_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10509 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001 X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra --part1_17a.e5c1bc2.2ab10ee6_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/11/2002 12:42:43 PM Central Daylight Time, lojban-out@lojban.org writes: << > It is not the case that the whole point of lujvo is that someone > > should be able to dissect them and figure out what you mean. The whole > > point of lujvo is that they are words formed from parts that have > > independent meaning within Lojban, but with a meaning that is not > > equivalent to the sum of their parts. Their dissectablity is not their > > point. > > OK. What is their point? >> Now who is being deliberately obtuse? --part1_17a.e5c1bc2.2ab10ee6_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/11/2002 12:42:43 PM Central Daylight Time, lojban-out@lojban.org writes:

<<
It is not the case that the whole point of lujvo is that someone
> should be able to dissect them and figure out what you mean. The whole
> point of lujvo is that they are words formed from parts that have
> independent meaning within Lojban, but with a meaning that is not
> equivalent to the sum of their parts. Their dissectablity is not their
> point.

OK.  What is their point?

>>
Now who is being deliberately obtuse?
 --part1_17a.e5c1bc2.2ab10ee6_boundary--