From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Sep 11 16:05:41 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 11 Sep 2002 23:05:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 30442 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2002 23:05:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Sep 2002 23:05:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Sep 2002 23:05:39 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17pGYG-0006KN-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:05:40 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17pGXj-0006K5-00; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:05:07 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17pGXc-0006Jw-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:05:00 -0700
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:05:00 -0700
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] word for "www" (was: Archive location.)
Message-ID: <20020911230500.GD23949@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <f7.2126c4cb.2ab059ab@aol.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20020911163304.03352e80@pop.east.cox.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020911163304.03352e80@pop.east.cox.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 1167
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 04:59:32PM -0400, Robert LeChevalier wrote:
> If a print dictionary has a smaller set of words than we have
> definitions for because of the costs of print, I still intend that
> there exist an online dictionary which will be unabridged and possibly
> continuously evolving. Whether Jay's project will meet the needs for
> the online version I can't say, since I've never quite grasped what he
> is trying for.

He's trying for exactly what you just described. And has succeeded
quite well, IMO, even if it's not quite finished.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest.
le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno
je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/




