From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Sep 18 18:07:33 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 19 Sep 2002 01:07:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 2587 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2002 01:07:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 19 Sep 2002 01:07:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2002 01:07:32 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17rpog-00089h-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 18:09:14 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17rpoA-00089N-00; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 18:08:42 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 18 Sep 2002 18:08:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17rpo7-00089C-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 18:08:39 -0700 Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 18:08:39 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: Re: [lojban] interactive story Message-ID: <20020919010839.GK29160@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20020919010947.GA13637@allusion.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020919010947.GA13637@allusion.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 1335 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 08:09:47PM -0500, Jordan DeLong wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 12:54:46AM +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote: > > Are these really meant to be {cmalu smaji}, "little quiet things", > > or were they supposed to be {smacu}? > > smacu > > (Which I suppose are also little quiet things, but still...) Oh. That's unfortunate. I had an amazingly silly idea for the next chapter. Something to the effect of: Unfortunately, since they were le smaji, no-one on the smaji terdi actually ever said anything. This was very boring. And going on like that for a while. Would you like me to edit s/smaji/smacu/ ? -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/