From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri Sep 20 22:22:03 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 21 Sep 2002 05:22:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 75859 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2002 05:22:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 21 Sep 2002 05:22:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Sep 2002 05:22:02 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17sckI-0004hG-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 22:23:58 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17scjf-0004gt-00; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 22:23:19 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 20 Sep 2002 22:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17scjc-0004gj-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 22:23:16 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g8L5RYGZ051296
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 00:27:35 -0500 (CDT)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g8L5RY3B051295
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 00:27:34 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 00:27:34 -0500
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] corrigible vlaste? RE: Re: I like chocolate
Message-ID: <20020921052734.GA51091@allusion.net>
References: <bc.2cc51040.2abd2323@aol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UugvWAfsgieZRqgk"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <bc.2cc51040.2abd2323@aol.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 1425
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 09:19:31PM -0400, pycyn@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 9/20/2002 2:23:20 PM Central Daylight Time,=20
> a.rosta@lycos.co.uk writes:
> <<
> > It's really the baseline that is ill-conceived. It is inevitable that
> > at the stage of development the language was at when it was baselined
> > it would be full of things awkward & ill-conceived.=20
> >>
> I suppose it was inevitable and the baseliners should have made some=20
> provision for it, but coming from a situation in which nothing was ever=20
> nailed down, but subject to change on (quite literally) a whim, they erre=
d in=20
> the othre direction. And, for all that, the results have been pretty=20
> unchallenged over the years -- we don't have a count, alas, but I have le=
ss=20
> than a hundred headings in my vocab files, and many of those are not real=
ly=20
> serious changes but clarifications and other are [well, you know, like=20
> yours].

FWIW, as a relatively new lojbanist (~5 mo), my interest in lojban
would be nonexistant if weren't even as stable as it is now. It
is difficult to take a conlang seriously when changes happen
constantly, rendering much existing text incorrect. Obviously
clarifications, and fixing of mistakes (vo'a) are both neccesary
and good, so I support them. But redesign of the language every
few days is counter productive (assuming one cares at all about the
size of the speaker-base).

Baseline =3D=3D good.

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE9jANGDrrilS51AZ8RAhm6AKDKmDEmtKVpxiOEk3CWiMEswDmV7gCgxAHL
rOnUNv8fanK34zwNOilHYRY=
=7yti
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk--

