From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri Sep 20 22:55:19 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 21 Sep 2002 05:55:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 9410 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2002 05:55:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 21 Sep 2002 05:55:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Sep 2002 05:55:19 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17sdGV-0004mP-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 22:57:15 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17sdFv-0004m7-00; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 22:56:39 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 20 Sep 2002 22:56:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from miranda.org ([209.58.150.153] ident=qmailr) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 17sdFs-0004ly-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 22:56:36 -0700 Received: (qmail 24468 invoked by uid 534); 21 Sep 2002 05:54:38 -0000 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 23:54:38 -0600 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: Re: [lojban] corrigible vlaste? RE: Re: I like chocolate Message-ID: <20020920235438.C31365@miranda.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from pycyn@aol.com on Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 09:19:31PM -0400 X-archive-position: 1427 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jkominek@miranda.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jay F Kominek From: Jay F Kominek Reply-To: jkominek@miranda.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 09:19:31PM -0400, pycyn@aol.com wrote: > > I wonder whether it would be worthwhile keeping on a wiki a > > ma'oste and gi'uste where revisions can be made that correct some > > of the faults of the baselined versions -- stripping out > > unnecessary sumti places, making place structures consistent, > > revising definitions, etc. That way we have some sort of ongoing > > record of what the vocab should be like had it not been baselined, > > and it also means that we have a shared point of reference. > > It might be useful to have them some public place, but I think that > the Wiki, which probably wants to keep its LLG approval rating, is > the wrong place. I offer the Loccan archives for now and will pump > up a list of existing questions for a place with that. This is what > loCCan is for, after all. It probably doesn't even mind > Cloud-cuckooese, as long as there is a reasonable connection the > historic Loglan and Lojban. The Wiki rejects all association with the LLG, and has never knowingly sought the approval of anyone. If I was trying to keep the Wiki somehow LLG-compliant, I wouldn't let And get away with his experimental cmavo silliness on the Wiki. If he wants to use it for some new sort of silliness, thats fine. As another Wiki user, I would however, act to make sure it is properly portrayed. -- Jay Kominek Tact is the ability to tell a man he has an open mind when he has a hole in his head.