From pycyn@aol.com Sat Sep 21 08:19:24 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 21 Sep 2002 15:19:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 6105 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2002 15:19:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 21 Sep 2002 15:19:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r05.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.101) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Sep 2002 15:19:23 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.10.) id r.21.2456b622 (4402) for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 11:19:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <21.2456b622.2abde7f7@aol.com> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 11:19:19 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] corrigible vlaste? RE: Re: I like chocolate To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_21.2456b622.2abde7f7_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10509 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001 X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra --part1_21.2456b622.2abde7f7_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/21/2002 12:55:41 AM Central Daylight Time, lojban-out@lojban.org writes: << > The Wiki rejects all association with the LLG, and has never knowingly > sought the approval of anyone. > > If I was trying to keep the Wiki somehow LLG-compliant, I wouldn't let > And get away with his experimental cmavo silliness on the Wiki. > > If he wants to use it for some new sort of silliness, thats fine. As > another Wiki user, I would however, act to make sure it is properly > portrayed. > >> This is more than enough for me. Thank you for the clarification. (This means I can post some of my stuff, too -- properly labelled) --part1_21.2456b622.2abde7f7_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/21/2002 12:55:41 AM Central Daylight Time, lojban-out@lojban.org writes:

<<
The Wiki rejects all association with the LLG, and has never knowingly
sought the approval of anyone.

If I was trying to keep the Wiki somehow LLG-compliant, I wouldn't let
And get away with his experimental cmavo silliness on the Wiki.

If he wants to use it for some new sort of silliness, thats fine. As
another Wiki user, I would however, act to make sure it is properly
portrayed.
>>
This is more than enough for me.  Thank you for the clarification.
(This means I can post some of my stuff, too -- properly labelled) --part1_21.2456b622.2abde7f7_boundary--