From lojban-out@lojban.org Sat Sep 21 12:01:16 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 21 Sep 2002 19:01:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 5315 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2002 19:01:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 21 Sep 2002 19:01:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Sep 2002 19:01:15 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17spX9-0006y6-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 12:03:15 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17spWP-0006xo-00; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 12:02:29 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 21 Sep 2002 12:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17spWM-0006xf-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 12:02:26 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g8LJ6iGZ061761
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 14:06:44 -0500 (CDT)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g8LJ6iPE061760
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 14:06:44 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 14:06:43 -0500
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: ma do nanca .i na'i
Message-ID: <20020921190643.GA61553@allusion.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 1440
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Normally lojban is strict about number claims. If I say "re le
gerku", it can not be true if 3 is the real number. Does this hold
for bridi which accept numbers, like nanca, mitre, cacra, etc? So
for example, if someone says
ma nanca do
and the response is
li mu
is the respondent lying? Would the proper answer be
li ji'imu

(assuming the respondent isn't *exactly* 5 years old).

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE9jMNDDrrilS51AZ8RAqsyAJ4syoHI0LOj4jkMVsFUUx9asUrjegCgiNz4
UdMFskMOqKRyJFTKAPLGhgo=
=Quc0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE--

