From lojban-out@lojban.org Sat Sep 21 17:38:50 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 22 Sep 2002 00:38:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 51174 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2002 00:38:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Sep 2002 00:38:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2002 00:38:50 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17sunr-0007wC-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 17:40:51 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17sunD-0007vj-00; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 17:40:11 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 21 Sep 2002 17:40:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17sunA-0007vY-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 17:40:08 -0700 Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 17:40:08 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Sets and classes Message-ID: <20020922004008.GM28894@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <02092120101005.02144@neofelis> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <02092120101005.02144@neofelis> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 1449 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 08:10:10PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote: > In mathematical usage, "class" is {klesi} (or maybe {zilkle} since x2 > is always sets) and "set" appears to be {selcmi}. But what of the > empty set? {} selcmi noda, and {selcmi noda} is equivalent to {na > selcmi}. So what is the word for "set"? What makes you think that selcmi noda == na selcmi? And what about lo selcmi poi kunti? -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/