From pycyn@aol.com Sat Sep 21 17:59:43 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 22 Sep 2002 00:59:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 46356 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2002 00:59:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Sep 2002 00:59:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d01.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.33) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2002 00:59:43 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.10.) id r.b6.121b3f8f (4468) for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 20:59:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 20:59:39 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] bloti/marce To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_b6.121b3f8f.2abe6ffb_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10509 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001 X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra --part1_b6.121b3f8f.2abe6ffb_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/21/2002 2:14:24 PM Central Daylight Time, gordon.dyke@bluewin.ch writes: << > If I understand correctly then, bloti were intended to go on water, just > like karce have wheels? > > Could someone who was around when the place-structures were being debated > please confirm or deny the original intention? >> I'd bet on it, but given what all is missing, I'm not sure. If I had been told that {carce} at least covered sleds, I wouldn't have been surprise -- indeed, I still wouldn't be, given the odd definition (from my pov at the moment) of {skiji}. Still, I would go with the obvious from the English ('boat" is -- gravy aside -- clearer than "ship" or "vessel" would be; we'll skip Maine jokes about cars). --part1_b6.121b3f8f.2abe6ffb_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/21/2002 2:14:24 PM Central Daylight Time, gordon.dyke@bluewin.ch writes:

<<

If I understand correctly then, bloti were intended to go on water, just
like karce have wheels?

Could someone who was around when the place-structures were being debated
please confirm or deny the original intention?

>>
I'd bet on it, but given what all is missing, I'm not sure. If I had been told that {carce} at least covered sleds, I wouldn't have been surprise -- indeed, I still wouldn't be, given the odd definition (from my pov at the moment) of {skiji}. Still, I would go with the obvious from the English ('boat" is -- gravy aside -- clearer than "ship" or "vessel" would be; we'll skip Maine jokes about cars). --part1_b6.121b3f8f.2abe6ffb_boundary--