From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sat Sep 21 19:40:25 2002
Return-Path: <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 22 Sep 2002 02:40:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 56518 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2002 02:40:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Sep 2002 02:40:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.185)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2002 02:40:24 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
  Sat, 21 Sep 2002 19:40:24 -0700
Received: from 200.69.6.18 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
  Sun, 22 Sep 2002 02:40:24 GMT
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Bcc: 
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Sets and classes
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 02:40:24 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F185AkK5LqN33HFnwpG00002926@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Sep 2002 02:40:24.0838 (UTC) FILETIME=[674C3A60:01C261E1]
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Originating-IP: [200.69.6.18]
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566
X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000


la djorden cusku di'e

>The selcmi noda = na selcmi is done by exploiting something in
>chapter 16 (search for ``External Bridi Negation'') and then ignoring
>the fact that "na selcmi" implies something different:
>
> selcmi noda ==
> selcmi naku da ==
> naku zo'u selcmi da ==
> na selcmi da
>
>this is all find and good. But for some reason people decide to
>drop the da after the point, claiming it's the same as na selcmi.
>Though perhaps the zo'e could be "da", it is at the least misleading,
>and at the most plain wrong.

Certainly {na selcmi} does not entail {na selcmi da}, because
{zo'e} could be a particular value from context such that its
relationship is being denied, so they are clearly not equivalent.

But does not {na selcmi da} entail {na selcmi}? How could the
second one be false if the first one is true?

One could ask, does {lo selcmi be no da} belong to {lo'i selcmi}?
I don't see how it could.

{zilselcmi} should cover all sets though, including the empty one.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com


