From phma@webjockey.net Sat Sep 21 20:23:40 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 22 Sep 2002 03:23:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 25116 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2002 03:23:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Sep 2002 03:23:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2002 03:23:40 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id E3AFC3C476; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 23:23:31 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Sets and classes Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 23:23:22 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <02092123232207.02144@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com From: Pierre Abbat X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 On Saturday 21 September 2002 23:07, Jorge Llambias wrote: li'o > Perhaps the rule should be changed so that unfilled sumti places > should by default be filled with {zi'o} rather than {zo'e}? It > would certainly make some things more intuitive. No, they should be filled with {zo'e} so that whatever is implied by context can go there. But in this case, the sumti implied by context is {zi'o}. phma