From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sat Sep 21 21:13:52 2002
Return-Path: <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 22 Sep 2002 04:13:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 26143 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2002 04:13:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Sep 2002 04:13:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.180)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2002 04:13:51 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
  Sat, 21 Sep 2002 21:13:51 -0700
Received: from 200.69.6.24 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
  Sun, 22 Sep 2002 04:13:51 GMT
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Bcc: 
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Sets and classes
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 04:13:51 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F180az5cBG83Fn04nDV00002942@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Sep 2002 04:13:51.0938 (UTC) FILETIME=[7563CA20:01C261EE]
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Originating-IP: [200.69.6.24]
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566
X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000


la djorden cusku di'e

>Saying that containing 0 things is the same as not being a container
>would be pretty broken, though.

If it contains 0 things it is not containing. With Lojban it is
usually more intuitive to think of predicates as verbs.

>We shouldn't just deny that 0 is a
>valid number.

Nobody is denying that.

>su'o da selcmi node ==
>su'o da selcmi naku de ==
>su'o da naku de zo'u da selcmi de ==
>naku roda de zo'u da selcmi de
>It is false that, for all X there is a Y such that X is a set
>containing Y.
>
>i.e., that says exactly what you'd expect from the the first one:
>	su'o da selcmi node
>	there is at least one set which contains nothing.

It says there is at least one thing that is not a selcmi of
anything, but nowhere does it say that that thing is a set.

>I don't see why you can't have it be a selcmi be noda. 0 is as valid
>a number as anything else.

Then would you say too that {lo patfu be noda} is a member of
{lo'i patfu}?

A better gloss for {selcmi} might be "membered thing".
Is the empty set a "membered thing"?

mu'o mi'e xorxes



_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


