From phma@webjockey.net Sat Sep 21 21:50:55 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 22 Sep 2002 04:50:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 74463 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2002 04:50:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Sep 2002 04:50:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2002 04:50:54 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id D75E03C476; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 00:50:53 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Sets and classes Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 00:50:50 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <02092200505009.02144@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com From: Pierre Abbat X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 On Sunday 22 September 2002 00:13, Jorge Llambias wrote: > la djorden cusku di'e > >We shouldn't just deny that 0 is a > >valid number. > > Nobody is denying that. Well then I'll try to talk some sense into nobody and convince him that it is. phma