From pycyn@aol.com Sun Sep 22 13:27:38 2002
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 22 Sep 2002 20:27:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 88803 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2002 20:27:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m12.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Sep 2002 20:27:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r10.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.106)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2002 20:27:37 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com
  by imo-r10.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.11.) id r.172.f01b4c0 (25711)
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 16:27:33 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <172.f01b4c0.2abf81b5@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 16:27:33 EDT
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Sets and classes
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_172.f01b4c0.2abf81b5_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10509
From: pycyn@aol.com
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001
X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra

--part1_172.f01b4c0.2abf81b5_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 9/22/2002 6:15:58 AM Central Daylight Time, 
a.rosta@lycos.co.uk writes:

<<
> "Only if {selcmi} can mean {se cmima be zi'o}". The empty
> set is definitely not a se cmima. However, it might well
> be a selcmi.
>>
Only if {selcmi} by itself is genuinely a lujvo and thus open to a new 
reading altogether. Several reasons have been given agains this view. This 
is the first vaguely convincing case in its favor.

--part1_172.f01b4c0.2abf81b5_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2>In a message dated 9/22/2002 6:15:58 AM Central Daylight Time, a.rosta@lycos.co.uk writes:<BR>
<BR>
&lt;&lt;<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">"Only if {selcmi} can mean {se cmima be zi'o}". The empty<BR>
set is definitely not a se cmima. However, it might well<BR>
be a selcmi.</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
&gt;&gt;<BR>
Only if {selcmi} by itself is genuinely a lujvo and thus open to a new reading altogether.&nbsp; Several reasons have been given agains this view.&nbsp; This is the first vaguely convincing case in its favor.<BR>
</FONT></HTML>
--part1_172.f01b4c0.2abf81b5_boundary--

