From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Sep 22 18:44:20 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_3); 23 Sep 2002 01:44:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 87179 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2002 01:44:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 23 Sep 2002 01:44:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Sep 2002 01:44:20 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17tIIu-00065k-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 18:46:28 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17tIIN-00065R-00; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 18:45:55 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 22 Sep 2002 18:45:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from miranda.org ([209.58.150.153] ident=qmailr) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 17tIIJ-00065I-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 18:45:52 -0700 Received: (qmail 29048 invoked by uid 534); 23 Sep 2002 01:43:42 -0000 Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 19:43:42 -0600 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Tengwar on frontespieces Message-ID: <20020922194342.I31365@miranda.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from opoudjis@optushome.com.au on Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:15:19AM +1000 X-archive-position: 1502 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jkominek@miranda.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jay F Kominek From: Jay F Kominek Reply-To: jkominek@miranda.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:15:19AM +1000, Nick Nicholas wrote: > (con) Tengwar is Grand Geek Central, and We Don't Want Lojban > Associated With It; Bwah. Hah. Hah. > Would anyone vehemently object to the Lessons cover art containing > Tengwar alongside Roman script for Lojban? Not me. > Would anyone objecting object less vehemently if the Tengwar is > somehow disguised, stylised, or deemphasised? Though I don't think it should appear with the same sort of emphasis as the Roman characters. IMO, the point is to avoid people thinking (upon first look) and they're going to find any significant amount of foreign script on the inside. > Same question for Level 0. I'm not worried one way or the other for level 0. Though, same thing about deemphasis. They both need really good artwork, though. (And high resolution, too. 600-1200 DPI. Don't want a repeat of the grainy art in the CLL) -- Jay Kominek X is the second worst windowing system in the world, but all the others are tied for first.