From xod@thestonecutters.net Fri Sep 27 11:48:26 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 27 Sep 2002 18:48:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 2117 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2002 18:48:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 27 Sep 2002 18:48:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Sep 2002 18:48:26 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17v0Cf-0003sC-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 11:51:05 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17v0C4-0003rt-00; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 11:50:28 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 27 Sep 2002 11:50:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17v0C1-0003rk-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 11:50:25 -0700 Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8RIlhe68182 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:47:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:47:43 -0400 (EDT) To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] ka ka (was: Context Leapers) In-Reply-To: <1a8.93d78ba.2ac5ef47@aol.com> Message-ID: <20020927143408.R68060-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 1634 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Invent Yourself Reply-To: xod@thestonecutters.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=110189215 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 pycyn@aol.com wrote: > (While looking for this, I found examples I have long been looking for of > {ka} used not as {du'u ce'u} but as the parallel to {ni} in 14.19.1&2 (365), > a section on connectives! Not mentioned in the index.) This ni-like usage of ka, which of course is completely redundant with ni, is also seen right in 11.5:5.4. And ni is redundant with jei inasmuch as I don't see any real distinction in the sentence "The ``blueness of the picture'' discussed in Section 5 refers to the measurable amount of blue pigment (or other source of blueness), not to the degree of truth of the claim that blueness is present." -- Before Sept. 11 there was not the present excited talk about a strike on Iraq. There is no evidence of any connection between Iraq and that act of terrorism. Why would that event change the situation? -- Howard Zinn