From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Fri Sep 27 16:41:06 2002
Return-Path: <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
X-Sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 27 Sep 2002 23:41:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 67767 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2002 23:41:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 27 Sep 2002 23:41:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailbox-13.st1.spray.net) (212.78.202.113)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Sep 2002 23:41:05 -0000
Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-67-49.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.67.49])
  by mailbox-13.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
  id 598293ED5F; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 01:41:03 +0200 (DST)
To: "John Cowan" <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Cc: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: interactions between tenses, other tenses, and NA
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 00:42:40 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMMEJHGJAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <200209272023.QAA29266@mail2.reutershealth.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=122260811
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin

John:
> And Rosta scripsit:
> 
> > To me it seems one of the more naturalistic features of Lojban --
> > a quirky, exceptional, counterintuitive, unnecessary complication,
> > of the sort natlangs are full of & Lojban is largely free of.
> 
> What is alien is that a contradictory negation particle should be other
> than at the beginning of the sentence.
> 
> In Loglan, sentence-initial "no" served this function. IIRC, Lojbab
> consciously moved it from the natural sentence-initial position to just
> before the selbri "because it was more naturalistic". IMHO a mistake.

As is obvious, I agree that the decision was a terrible mistake, but
the idea that "it was more naturalistic" is fairly defensible,
given that (a) some lects of English have it, and (b) quirkiness,
exception-riddenness, counterintuiveness and unnecessary complication
is highly characteristic of natlangs, as evidenced by the way that
more accomplished naturalistic artlangers deliberately try to add
it to their conlangs.

--And.

