From jjllambias@xxxxxxx.xxxx Mon Nov 29 13:31:57 1999 X-Digest-Num: 297 Message-ID: <44114.297.1615.959273825@eGroups.com> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 13:31:57 PST From: "Jorge Llambias" I think you're each half-right: it has to be *a* relevant answer. So >"John" would be an adequate answer even if he was not the only one to >have come. I'm not convinced. Suppose John and Paul were the only ones who came, and Mary knows that John came but not that Paul came. Now: (1) Does Mary know who came? Yes, she knows that John came. (2) Does Mary know who came? No, she only knows that John came, but not that Paul did too. I find (2) acceptable and (1) suspect, but I suppose other people can make other judgements. co'o mi'e xorxes