From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Sat Sep 28 06:04:37 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 28 Sep 2002 13:04:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 49322 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2002 13:04:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Sep 2002 13:04:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailbox-8.st1.spray.net) (212.78.202.108) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Sep 2002 13:04:36 -0000 Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-67-235.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.67.235]) by mailbox-8.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9424F2567D for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 15:04:33 +0200 (DST) To: Subject: RE: [lojban] paroi ro mentu Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 14:06:11 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <02092621371902.18442@neofelis> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 From: "And Rosta" X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=122260811 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin pier: > {le plini cu mulcarna paroi ro mentu} is correct. {ro da poi mentu zo'u > le plini cu mulcarna paroi da} is also correct but sounds funny; if {le} were > replaced with {lo} in both sentences, the second would mean "For every > minute, there is a planet that completes a turn during it," whereas the first > would mean "There is a planet that completes a turn every minute." Why does that make {ro da poi mentu zo'u le plini cu mulcarna paroi da} sound funny? --And.