From lojban-out@lojban.org Sat Sep 28 13:43:25 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 28 Sep 2002 20:43:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 92983 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2002 20:43:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Sep 2002 20:43:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Sep 2002 20:43:25 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17vOTc-0008QP-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 13:46:12 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17vOSs-0008Q7-00; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 13:45:26 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 28 Sep 2002 13:45:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17vOSp-0008Py-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 13:45:23 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g8SKnXGZ044681
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 15:49:33 -0500 (CDT)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g8SKnWdY044680
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 15:49:32 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 15:49:32 -0500
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: paroi ro mentu
Message-ID: <20020928204932.GA44642@allusion.net>
References: <20020928192543.GA43408@allusion.net> <an531b+29q6@eGroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <an531b+29q6@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 1679
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 08:22:03PM -0000, jjllambias2000 wrote:
> la djorden cusku di'e
[...]
> > I agree in that it has the meaning of number 2. I don't agree that
> > it has the side effect of defining ko'a. A better way of putting it
> > is that it first expands to
> > pa le prenu cu klama la paris gi'e klama la romas
>=20
> Then the {paroiku} case first expands to:
>=20
> paroiku mi klama la paris gi'e klama la romas
>=20
> {paroiku} should behave just like {pa prenu}.

paroiku should behave just like any other floating tense-modal. For
example
baku mi klama la romas. .e la paris.
means
mi ba klama la romas. gi'e ba klama la paris.
mi ba klama la romas. .ije mi ba klama la paris.
and not
mi ba klama la romas. gi'e klama la paris.

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE9lhXcDrrilS51AZ8RArANAJ9m7q39GlJnoC6sreUQy2bwwjq/mACeKvGi
uUU73tHtK7h1q0FmMyZ57yw=
=z3We
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd--

