From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sat Sep 28 13:58:48 2002
Return-Path: <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 28 Sep 2002 20:58:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 21260 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2002 20:58:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Sep 2002 20:58:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.59)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Sep 2002 20:58:47 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
  Sat, 28 Sep 2002 13:58:47 -0700
Received: from 200.69.6.35 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
  Sat, 28 Sep 2002 20:58:47 GMT
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Bcc: 
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: paroi ro mentu
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 20:58:47 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F595Eh3sJg1VIGGKxhB000093ff@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Sep 2002 20:58:47.0751 (UTC) FILETIME=[D6F93570:01C26731]
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Originating-IP: [200.69.6.35]
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566
X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000


la djorden cusku di'e

>paroiku should behave just like any other floating tense-modal.

Indeed.

>For
>example
> baku mi klama la romas. .e la paris.
>means
> mi ba klama la romas. gi'e ba klama la paris.
> mi ba klama la romas. .ije mi ba klama la paris.

Does that say that my going to Paris happens after my going to
Rome?

>and not
> mi ba klama la romas. gi'e klama la paris.

But nobody suggested that {paroiku} would apply to the first
connectand only. I would have said:

baku zo'u ge mi klama la paris gi mi klama la romas

I don't think this establishes which of Paris or Rome is gone
to first. If distributing {ba} makes no difference to the
meaning, I don't see how this helps us to decide whether
{paroiku} can be distributed or not. Consider one that clearly
does make a difference:

ta'eku mi klama la paris e la romas

This is:

ta'eku zo'u ge mi klama la paris gi mi klama la romas
Typically, I go both to Paris and to Rome.

Is this the same as:

ta'eku mi klama la paris ije ta'eku mi klama la romas
Typically I go to Paris, and typically I go to Rome.

I don't think it is. Or use {ta'enai} for an even more clear case.

mu'o mi'e xorxes



_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com


