Subject: Re: [lojban] sticky hypothesis

From: "Lionel Vidal" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:22:00 +0200

And:
> {da'i fu'e <sentences>}, I think.

Well, I restricted {fu'e} to attitudinals, but I do not object to extend
its use to discursives. The problem is that I would understand
{dai'ifu'e} as a scope indicator for what is hypothetical
rather than a scope indicator for the consequences of the
hypothesis, which is what I am really looking for.

mu'omi'e lioNEL