From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sun Sep 29 07:52:48 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 29 Sep 2002 14:52:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 67176 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2002 14:52:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Sep 2002 14:52:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.146) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Sep 2002 14:52:47 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 07:52:47 -0700 Received: from 200.69.6.30 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:52:46 GMT To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] sticky hypothesis Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:52:46 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Sep 2002 14:52:47.0252 (UTC) FILETIME=[DFE8BD40:01C267C7] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Originating-IP: [200.69.6.30] X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 la lionEL cusku di'e >I would like to be able to sate >an hypothesis in the {da'i} sense, then to express >a bunch of bridis all dependent of it but not connected in >any other way, and then to reverse to normal discourse. I think you want {ru'a} not {da'i} for this. Since {ru'acu'i} and {ru'anai} seem to be undefined, how about: ru'a: hypothesis ru'acu'i: dependents of hypothesis ru'anai: end hypothesis mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com