From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Sep 29 09:13:10 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 29 Sep 2002 16:13:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 81752 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2002 16:13:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Sep 2002 16:13:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Sep 2002 16:13:10 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17vgji-0004JE-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 09:16:02 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17vgj8-0004Iw-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 09:15:26 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 29 Sep 2002 09:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17vgj5-0004In-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 09:15:23 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g8TGJXGZ051673
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 11:19:33 -0500 (CDT)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g8TGJRGX051668
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 11:19:27 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 11:19:27 -0500
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: paroi ro mentu
Message-ID: <20020929161927.GA51631@allusion.net>
References: <F1886pkNzPZrIkyPzGN00000152@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <F1886pkNzPZrIkyPzGN00000152@hotmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 1719
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--5vNYLRcllDrimb99
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 04:07:05PM +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote:
> la djorden cusku di'e
> >You're breaking the same rules again. "paroi ro le re djedi" is a
> >single term. You can't just bring parts of it forward, all of it
> >must go if you want to keep the same meaning. You could do
> > paroi roda voi djedi zo'u mi klama la paris.
>=20
> {paroi ro le re djedi} is a single term as much as
> {paroi le pavdei e le reldei} is a single term. Whatever rule
> applies to one (scopewise) should apply to the other.

Of course...

> The rule I think is the Right Thing is that {e}/{ro} have
> scope over {pa} in that example.

That is of course the whole discussion. My viewpoint is that the
paroi scopes over the pavdei, which scopes over the reldei, etc.

> >It's quite clear to me that either convention for tag+sumti scopes
> >can be delt with consistently, and the book doesn't say which is
> >right. The book does say thing go left-to-right for terms, but
> >since these are in the same term in the parse it's not a definite
> >answer. I think left-to-right makes most sense, however, because it
> >seems to be what would be expected when using a tag which has a
> >quantifier in it, since everything else is left-to-right.
>=20
> Notice however that it's not just tags with explicit PA that are
> involved. For example {ze'a ro mentu} with my interpretation says
> that the event happens in each medium-length minute interval. With
> the other interpretation it says that the event happens in the
> medium interval consisting of all minutes (surely not very medium-
> length).

Good point. I don't know what ze'a <sumti> means for sure, but
maybe this can settle the issue for us if we can find an example
in the book which chooses one or the other.

[...]

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--5vNYLRcllDrimb99
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE9lygPDrrilS51AZ8RAgL6AKC8+mUxrjpPj/FnyHjZeZ/UST07NgCeL3IR
rOWW+11UBMSbCO5QdJbUAzk=
=Geoz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5vNYLRcllDrimb99--

