From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Sep 29 09:20:47 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 29 Sep 2002 16:20:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 45718 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2002 16:20:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Sep 2002 16:20:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Sep 2002 16:20:39 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17vgqy-0004L6-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 09:23:32 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17vgqM-0004Kk-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 09:22:54 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 29 Sep 2002 09:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17vgqJ-0004Kb-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 09:22:51 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g8TGR0GZ051860
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 11:27:00 -0500 (CDT)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g8TGR0ZI051859
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 11:27:00 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 11:27:00 -0500
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: paroi ro mentu
Message-ID: <20020929162700.GA51828@allusion.net>
References: <F1886pkNzPZrIkyPzGN00000152@hotmail.com> <20020929161927.GA51631@allusion.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020929161927.GA51631@allusion.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 1720
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 11:19:27AM -0500, Jordan DeLong wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 04:07:05PM +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote:
[...]
> > Notice however that it's not just tags with explicit PA that are
> > involved. For example {ze'a ro mentu} with my interpretation says
> > that the event happens in each medium-length minute interval. With
> > the other interpretation it says that the event happens in the
> > medium interval consisting of all minutes (surely not very medium-
> > length).
>=20
> Good point. I don't know what ze'a <sumti> means for sure, but
> maybe this can settle the issue for us if we can find an example
> in the book which chooses one or the other.

Hrm; the only example I could find using "ze'i" as a sumtcita has
no quantification. So much for that.. :P

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE9lynUDrrilS51AZ8RAmqeAKC0r5NHOrl7/fSCvwjHduHgKHt2zQCfaexw
JOLhdoJX/tSpwvAfMe9A9oQ=
=3pIs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu--

