From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Sep 29 10:04:16 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 29 Sep 2002 17:04:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 87418 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2002 17:04:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Sep 2002 17:04:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Sep 2002 17:04:15 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17vhXA-0004U5-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 10:07:08 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17vhWb-0004Tm-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 10:06:33 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 29 Sep 2002 10:06:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17vhWX-0004Td-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 10:06:29 -0700 Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g8THAdGZ052464 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 12:10:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com) Received: (from fracture@localhost) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g8THAdMP052463 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 12:10:39 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 12:10:39 -0500 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: sticky hypothesis Message-ID: <20020929171039.GA52418@allusion.net> References: <001301c267da$bb15e160$352af8c1@ftiq2awxk6> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001301c267da$bb15e160$352af8c1@ftiq2awxk6> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 1723 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong From: Jordan DeLong Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 07:06:43PM +0200, Lionel Vidal wrote: > Jordan: > >Anyway, so I suggest you could do something like: > > .i broda brodu .ini'i tu'e > > .i ko'a ko'e broda > > .i ko'e ko'a broda > > tu'u >=20 > Looks nice. But I would add {da'i} to the first bridi to mark > it outside the real world. And don't you think it should be Yeah; you would put whatever you wan't in the first bridi; I didn't fill it out because I didn't know what your circumstances were. > {.iseni'i}: I have not the CLL at hands but I think the the first bridi > goes in x2 place of {nibli} (anyway, I may confuse the places > of the causal) Yeah it should be seni'i. I hadn't read your other mail yet so I thought you had a hypothesis and were going to proove it with several statements, instead of having a hypothetical statement and saying what it would lead to. > I like your {tu'e} use which I had forgotten. --=20 Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u sei la mark. tuen. cusku --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9lzQPDrrilS51AZ8RAhGqAKCJhvr1WXCRdrg9UkQXJ7LuAx/ewACgl9it 74nA8UAmtb38veEUm7Qc64Y= =hFQ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j--