From phma@webjockey.net Mon Sep 30 12:31:45 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 30 Sep 2002 19:31:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 8599 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2002 19:31:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Sep 2002 19:31:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Sep 2002 19:31:42 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6529B3C47E; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:31:21 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] LOI PRENU GO PA MEI GI KA'E NAI TE JINGA? Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:31:10 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0209301531110I.30239@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com From: Pierre Abbat X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 On Monday 30 September 2002 12:13, Jorge Llambias wrote: > la and cusku di'e > > >How about {loi prenu go pa mei gi ka'e nai te jinga} > >that sounds pretty coolass to me -- something John might consent to chant. > > Yes, but {lei prenu} rather than {loi prenu}. Any individual > person, any pair, any threesome, can instantiate {loi prenu}. > That says "Some people, united, can never be defeated", not > what we mean. I'm not sure {prenu} is right. I was thinking of {le cecmu jonsi'u na ze'e .ai te jinga}. phma