From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Sep 30 17:10:45 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 1 Oct 2002 00:10:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 40321 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2002 00:10:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 1 Oct 2002 00:10:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Oct 2002 00:10:43 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17wAfY-0003OO-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 17:13:44 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17wAeu-0003O3-00; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 17:13:04 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 30 Sep 2002 17:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lakemtao02.cox.net ([68.1.17.243])
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17wAer-0003No-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 17:13:01 -0700
Received: from nora.lojban.org ([68.100.206.153]) by lakemtao02.cox.net
  (InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with ESMTP
  id <20021001000927.LRYJ12192.lakemtao02.cox.net@nora.lojban.org>
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 20:09:27 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020930201757.02ddc970@pop.east.cox.net>
X-Sender: noras@pop.east.cox.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 20:20:31 -0400
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: MELBI COI
In-Reply-To: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMCELJGJAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
References: <F127JqlErzdKTvuR7Qz000098cb@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-archive-position: 1779
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: noras@lojban.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Nora LeChevalier <noras@lojban.org>
From: Nora LeChevalier <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: noras@lojban.org
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

la and cusku di'e:
>xorxes
> > la and cusku di'e
> >
> > >Can you do any better than {cu se li'i rulmle ua}, given that the
> > >original is "(they) say (to me) 'what a beautiful flower!'"?
> >
> > (I think there's no "to me" in the original, they will just
> > say it.)
>
>Some versions have {mi diranno}. There is no canonical original
>version, which is one of the minor pleasures it holds for me. Any
>words are 'correct' as long as they approximate the basic meaning
>and fit the music.
>
> > Direct quotation seems out of the question, maybe just {cu xrula
> > melbi cusku ua}.
>
>Maybe {cu melbi xrula ganse ua}.

Can you use ti'e (evidential for hearsay): cu melbi xrula ti'e ua

or cu'u (I believe you had this at the end of a sentence, so it won't pick 
up any following sumti - zo'e therefore implied): cu melbi xrule cu'u ua


-- 
mi'e noras noras@lojban.org
Nora LeChevalier





