From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Oct 01 18:08:26 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 2 Oct 2002 01:08:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 31914 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2002 01:08:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Oct 2002 01:08:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 2002 01:08:24 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17wY32-0001N3-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 18:11:32 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17wY2V-0001Mg-00; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 18:10:59 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 01 Oct 2002 18:10:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17wY2Q-0001MW-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 18:10:54 -0700 Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g921F0GZ072691; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 20:15:00 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com) Received: (from fracture@localhost) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g921F0lv072690; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 20:15:00 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 20:15:00 -0500 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Cc: xod@thestonecutters.net Subject: [lojban] tu'o du'u (was Re: xoi'a) Message-ID: <20021002011500.GA72604@allusion.net> References: <20021001145930.L85859-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 1803 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong From: Jordan DeLong Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 01:58:55AM +0100, And Rosta wrote: [...] > (I do wish {tu'o du'u} could be reduced to one syllable. It'd be the > ultimate Zipfean saving. Are there any monosyllables still going > spare?) Errr; doesn't it need to be said a lot to justify that? No offense intended, but I've never seen anyone say it except you (I think it was the wiki page for poi'i). I'm not even sure what an unspecified number of du'us means that is different from the assumed default of su'opa if you were to say "lo du'u", "le du'u", or "lo'e du'u". --=20 Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u sei la mark. tuen. cusku --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9mkiUDrrilS51AZ8RAug8AJ9b9PIY8jl1cwiYECfhtskMtSK1LgCgs7yn NGwf8sL8DQPsmjjGnmjqprc= =MOr2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM--