From jcowan@reutershealth.com Wed Oct 02 03:54:07 2002
Return-Path: <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 2 Oct 2002 10:54:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 78800 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2002 10:54:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Oct 2002 10:54:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail2.reutershealth.com) (65.246.141.151)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 2002 10:54:07 -0000
Received: from skunk.reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[10.65.117.21])
  by mail2.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with SMTP id HAA17016;
  Wed, 2 Oct 2002 07:05:38 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200210021105.HAA17016@mail2.reutershealth.com>
Received: by skunk.reutershealth.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 2 Oct 2002 06:53:32 -0400
Subject: Re: [lojban] The kind of publicity we have now
To: nessus@free.fr (Lionel Vidal)
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 06:53:32 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com (Lojban List),
  jcowan@reutershealth.com (John Cowan)
In-Reply-To: <004501c269f2$33db3000$8a29f8c1@ftiq2awxk6> from "Lionel Vidal" at Oct 02, 2002 10:59:48 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=8122456
X-Yahoo-Profile: john_w_cowan

Lionel Vidal scripsit:

> I like the sig though, which seems appropriate:
> "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained
> by stupidity." Hanlon's Razor (Who is/was this Hanlon?)

Almost certainly a modification of Robert Heinlein, the sf author,
through oral tradition.

-- 
John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com www.reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan
"The exception proves the rule." Dimbulbs think: "Your counterexample proves
my theory." Classicists think "'Probat' means 'tests': the exception puts the
rule to the proof." But legal historians know it means "Evidence for an
exception is evidence of the existence of a rule in cases not excepted from."

