From jjllambias@hotmail.com Wed Oct 02 12:30:42 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 2 Oct 2002 19:30:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 85585 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2002 19:30:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Oct 2002 19:30:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n5.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.89) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 2002 19:30:41 -0000 Received: from [66.218.67.183] by n5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Oct 2002 19:30:29 -0000 Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 19:30:29 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: tu'a zo tordu .e zo cmalu Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <122.1825ae68.2acc9c8e@aol.com> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 911 X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster From: "jjllambias2000" X-Originating-IP: 200.49.74.2 X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 la pycyn cusku di'e > << > tordu: ko'a cmalu ko'e noi ralju pamoi cimde ko'a ku'o ko'i > jarki: ko'a cmalu ko'e noi ralju remoi cimde ko'a ku'o ko'i > cinla: ko'a cmalu ko'e noi ralju romoi cimde ko'a ku'o ko'i > >> > Thanks. I would tend to say {pamoi ralju} but am open to arguments on that > -- different underlying idions, I suspect (and mine probably English and not > Lojbanically defensible). Just {pamoi le ka ralju} -> {ralju pamoi}. > And I would use {cimoi} rather than {romoi} just because I don't want to > prejudge issues of possible dimensionality (I can see someone young being > small in the temporal dimension, for example). I don't understand how {romoi} prejudges anything here. I was thinking that we can eventually have things being thin (cinla) in four dimensions, five dimensions, etc. And I suspect that's why the gi'uste uses "least significant". mu'o mi'e xorxes