From jcowan@reutershealth.com Wed Oct 02 15:06:39 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 2 Oct 2002 22:06:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 55096 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2002 22:06:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Oct 2002 22:06:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail2.reutershealth.com) (65.246.141.151) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 2002 22:06:35 -0000 Received: from skunk.reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[10.65.117.21]) by mail2.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA28224; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 18:18:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200210022218.SAA28224@mail2.reutershealth.com> Received: by skunk.reutershealth.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 2 Oct 2002 18:05:58 -0400 Subject: Re: [lojban] bare cmevla To: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk (And Rosta) Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 18:05:58 -0400 (EDT) Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: from "And Rosta" at Oct 02, 2002 11:02:15 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Cowan X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=8122456 X-Yahoo-Profile: john_w_cowan And Rosta scripsit: > Baseline aside, would there be a downside to having bare cmevla in > BRIVLA or KOhA? Historically, bare names in Loglan were vocatives, and perhaps can still be used as such. -- John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com "You need a change: try Canada" "You need a change: try China" --fortune cookies opened by a couple that I know