From xod@thestonecutters.net Thu Oct 03 09:42:23 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 3 Oct 2002 16:42:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 2483 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2002 16:42:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Oct 2002 16:42:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Oct 2002 16:42:21 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17x96a-0002r2-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 09:45:40 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17x95m-0002qc-00; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 09:44:50 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 03 Oct 2002 09:44:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17x95i-0002qR-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 09:44:47 -0700 Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g93GfHc95660 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:41:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:41:17 -0400 (EDT) To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: a new kind of fundamentalism In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20021003113205.031bfec0@pop.east.cox.net> Message-ID: <20021003123939.N95321-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 1869 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Invent Yourself Reply-To: xod@thestonecutters.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=110189215 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > But what is really needed for the rest of us, is what pc was originally > doing with his "records" - creating a short summary of what was debated and > the conclusions that were reached, perhaps with an example. (pc's records > at one point started to become contentious enough that they restarted the > debate, which is I think when he stopped writing them, so records will only > work for issues on which consensus has been achieved, or where there are > clear options that can be described with the annotation of "agree to disagree". Records are fine, but they need to written on a level that all jboka'e can understand. All the Records I've seen were incomprehensibly dense. -- Before Sept. 11 there was not the present excited talk about a strike on Iraq. There is no evidence of any connection between Iraq and that act of terrorism. Why would that event change the situation? -- Howard Zinn